Showing posts with label visual. Show all posts
Showing posts with label visual. Show all posts

Tuesday, 12 January 2016

Translators are like glue

 
Pic of man's hands applying glue with brush for next sheet of wallpaper
Applying the glue behind the visual c. Patryk Kosmider


Professional translators are like glue... invisible glue. 

The aim is to make the join between two cultures as seamless as possible. 

It is easy to underestimate the value of a wordsmith's contribution to a marketing campaign. You don't see all the deliberations over the right term, tone or phrasing. Yet, without a translator's considered input, even the most brilliantly creative visuals can fall flat... or worse.

A pharmaceutical crisis
The importance of the glue reminds me of my first job at the UK sales agency of French glass manufacturers' Saint-Gobain Desjonquères. I worked for the pharmaceutical bottle division. 

One day, a buyer at one of our major pharmaceutical customers called urgently. Labels would not stick to our competitors' bottles. They had changed the coating specification.

It was a nightmarish situation for our customer. The production line was down and wasting money. Product was ready, but without viable containers. Orders were stacking up.

I arranged for the urgent delivery of all our existing factory stock. I also booked urgent new production runs with my French colleagues. 

I don't remember the exact figures now. I do remember dispatching millions of extra bottles to a very grateful customer that year.

The crisis came about because of poor bonding between the coating, glue and label.

Tales of woe  
The internet is littered with tales of woe because someone has cut corners with translation. Some brand-damaging stories are still shared decades later (as my old story above). Social media spreads these tales faster than ever before.

Choose the best
Many translators love to share these stories as examples of what can happen without their professional services. Personally, I prefer to try and demonstrate the positive. However, it isn't easy to see the glue when the bond is good. It is easy to think an alternative, cheaper solution might work ... until a crisis strikes.

Don't come unstuck. Stick with a professional translator.




Friday, 18 April 2014

Quantitative easing explained visually


The financial world loves to play with words. Jargon is rife. It is rarely static. It mutates constantly or dies a sudden death. 

To the outsider, financial terms are often impenetrable. Even an insider can go on holiday and return out-of-touch two weeks later. Recent glossary research uncovered a wealth of videos on financial topics to share with followers.

Financial reporting often mystifies the general public. The economic crisis has left ordinary people with a deep mistrust of the banking world. Quantitative easing causes particular bewilderment. A US video from 2010 with over 5.7 million viewings conveys that sense of bewilderment in a humorous and irreverent way:


Quantitative easing is an unconventional monetary policy. It is often seen as controversial. The unconventional is now apparently conventional. The Federal Reserve, the Bank of England and Bank of Japan have all used the policy. The European Central Bank may soon resort to quantitative easing. One of the Bank of England’s external policymakers has just claimed that quantitative easing increased the UK’s GDP by 3%.

Quantitative easing is often described as printing money. The aim is to increase the money supply in the economy. No actual money gets printed. These days the money is injected into the economy electronically.

Younger generations are much more likely to watch a short explanatory video than read a turgid glossary or lengthy text.  HP has an excellent paper on the power of visual communication.

The Bank of England has issued just such a video to explain how quantitative easing works:

Terminology often needs to be accessible to several different target audiences. A company or institution may need to use different terms in targeted communications. Traditional glossaries have advocated a single, consistent term. Modern marketing communications are increasingly personalised. The fund manager’s in-house terminology is not appropriate for some audiences. Terminology management will need even greater flexibility in future.

The new banking era requires greater transparency. Greater use of short videos to ease understanding of financial terminology for different audiences would seem to be an ideal way forward.

What do you think?