Showing posts with label neutral. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neutral. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 November 2016

Armed with a Pen

Pic of a pen with 3 bullets either side, all pointing upwards

He gave no speeches. 

He fired no bullets. 

Armed with only a pen and pencil, he changed the outcome of the War.


The Dutch cartoonist Louis Raemaekers became world famous during the First World War. His influence had a profound effect on the perception and course of events. He said:

“I want people to know, to think, to see the war as it is.”

As I entered the Dutch centre I was struck by a contrast. Happy, brightly-coloured modern paintings of cupcakes lined the walls. One of Raemaekers stark drawings appeared larger than life ahead of me.

Danse macabre
A woman was dancing with a skeleton. One bony hand rested at her waist, the other held her hand up. The skeleton had his back to the room. He was all bone except for his dance shoes. The woman was flesh and blood. She wore a gown, a crown and her hair in pigtails. She gazed up into his eyes (or where they should have been). Maybe she still saw the man she once knew? She seemed weak and hunched. Her red eyes contrasted against red lipstick in the otherwise dark cartoon.

The image made me think of the generation of women left behind. I later discovered that my interpretation was wrong. The following words appeared under the cartoon:

The German Tango – “From East to West and West to East, I dance with thee.”

Raemaekers portrays Germany in the thrall of a medieval danse macabre. It is a dance to the death. Once begun, it cannot be stopped.

A quotation from Louis Raemaekers’ obituary in The Times also appeared on the screen:

“It has been said of Louis Raemaekers that he was the one private individual who exercised a real and great influence on the course of the 1914-18 War.

Louis Raemaekers stands conspicuous as the one man who, without any assistance of title or office, indubitably swayed the destinies of peoples.”
London, July 1956

Dutch Centre Talk
Who was this influential man now apparently forgotten? Ariane de Ranitz presented her research and book on Louis Raemaekers to the Dutch Centre’s audience. Two of the cartoonists' great-grandchildren were present to hear about their ancestor.

Upbringing
Louis Raemaekers was born and grew up in Roermond in the Netherlands. The city stands in the South-east of the Netherlands. Both Belgium and Germany are within ‘touching’ distance on either side. The young Louis regularly visited his German mother’s relatives over the border. He developed a strong sense of right and wrong.

Emotional Cartoons
His later cartoons scream outrage against the use of citizens as human shields. He lived in neutral Netherlands. Belgian refugees poured across the border describing massacres by German soldiers. Raemaekers drew with a deep sense of shock. Although nervous, he could not stay silent. While the national government remained neutral, he felt that an individual was free to hold a different opinion.

Raemaekers’ cartoons appeared in De Telegraaf. They were not small, hidden at the bottom of the page, inside or at the back. They were huge drawings dead centre on the front page of the broadsheet.

Dutch Neutrality
It seems remarkable today, as it did at the time, that the fiercest satire should come from a neutral rather than a Frenchman or Belgian against Germany. His work carried more weight worldwide because of Dutch neutrality. 

Ultimately, Raemaekers had to leave the Netherlands for Britain for his own safety and that of his family. The German Kaiser had put a bounty on his head. 

Britain to US
From Britain, he ridiculed the indecisiveness of the American President to intervene in the war. His involvement in Allied War propaganda spread in a variety of formats. Lloyd George persuaded Raemaekers to go to the US. There, thousands of American newspapers published his cartoons. He changed the tide of opinion.

Second World War
As early as 1933, Raemaekers again spotted and depicted the threat coming this time from Nazi Germany. He had to leave for the US shortly before the start of the Second World War. His drawings, papers and correspondence with leaders such as Churchill were sent on ahead to Stanford University.

Many nations covered Louis Raemaekers in honours. His native Netherlands took much longer to recognise the great achievements of his pen. His epitaph reads:

Here rests Louis Raemaekers, great warrior for truth and justice.



Links and references: 
Ariane de Ranitz: Louis Raemaekers (link includes the danse macabre cartoon described above)
The Dutch Centre


Karen Andrews is a
freelance French to 
English translator,
transcreator, 
copywriter and
editor. She also has 
background in
marketing and 
project management.



Email Karen for further information via karenanglicityen@gmail.com in French, German or English.

Wednesday, 20 April 2016

At Dr Johnson's House

Pic of cat statue


Terminologists are at the forefront of language change. As languages evolve in response to changes in society, lexicographers have to decide how to represent these changes in dictionary definitions and examples.

The ITI's Terminology Network gathered recently in the garret of Dr Johnson's House. We discussed new approaches to gender in languages today. Neither Dr Johnson pictured in his garret nor his bluestocking friend Elizabeth Carter downstairs could have imagined some of the challenges faced by terminologists, lexicographers and translators today.


Dr Johnson's House hidden behind Fleet Street


Eyvor Fogarty introduced our three speakers:
  • Professor Emerita Margaret Rogers, University of Surrey - Introduction to the topic: Gender and Language
  • Professor Peter Sherwood - Gender and Lexicography: Setting an Example? Notes on gender imbalance
  • John Ayto, writer and lexicographer - Janet and John in Dictionaryland 

Gender-neutral English
Margaret Rogers drew our attention to some of the difficulties that today's gender-neutral, politically correct language can get us into today. Pages 54-6 of the very recent March 2016 version of the European Commission's English Style Guide gives guidance on gender-neutral language. Existing legislation often uses "he" to include women. "He/she" is now regarded as "cumbersome" and "excessively formal". 

The lack of grammatical gender in English can make a translator's life difficult. We have just have the one term "translator" for the marked Übersetzer and Übersetzerin in German. English no longer refers to air hostesses, preferring the gender-neutral flight attendants today. Yet, we end up not knowing whether a doctor is a man or a woman. This results in the question: "Would you like to see a lady doctor?"

Hungarian
Peter Sherwood contrasted the situation in Hungarian. A PhD study has shown that dictionary examples of usage appear to have gone in an opposite direction to our expectation. Post-communist Hungarian is more likely to attribute success to male gender. It is important that a lexicographer exercises judgement in choosing authentic examples. Google's frequency of use is not a good guide. The extraordinary paradox is that the Hungarian dictionary concerned had a female editor and team. Does it suggest that sexual equality has gone backwards in Hungary?

Luxembourgish
In the subsequent discussions, issues from other languages were given. The Luxembourgish word for girl is neuter. It confuses English students to have to refer to a "she" as "it". This is further complicated by referring to a female family member as "it" and other women more formally as "she".

French and English
French seems to avoid all these issues. It continues to use the impersonal "on", while "one" is now considered very old-fashioned in English. We avoid referring to a child as "it" too now. It seems offensive. We now tend to use "they" to get around such issues: e.g. Someone's left their umbrella.

Modern Cultural Dilemmas
Isabelle gave some particularly interesting modern examples of issues. Census forms now need to deal with the issue of transgender and cisgender. Working between cultures changing at different rates can present particular problems to translators and terminologists. Isabelle illustrated this with an entry in the UN's glossary for the Indian English term eve teasing for sexual harassment. There was an outcry regarding the initial description as a euphemism. A revision gave more precise geography on its usage. 

Luxembourg once had to pulp a complete dictionary edition due to anti-semitic examples.

Great care and consideration are still required by today's terminologists and lexicographers even if the internet has completely transformed their roles.

After the talk, we all took some time to explore Dr Johnson's House. His famous dictionary was on display in a case.

We all paused to admire the statue of Dr Johnson's beloved cat Hodge:


"A very fine cat indeed".

Pic of the small statue Dr Johnson's cat in the street opposite his home
Statue of Hodge, Dr Johnson's Cat



Karen Andrews runs
Anglicity Ltd. As a 
professional translator
she recognises the
importance of thoroughly
researching her clients'
terminology as part of the
translation process.

She also offers copywriting
and transcreation services.



For further information see Anglicity's website